The statute of limitations in California is structured in such a way that more serious cases have longer statutes of limitations.

This article will delve into everything a victim needs to know about California’s statute of limitations for sexual harassment.

What is the embezzlement statute of limitations? California has a few rules that this article will explain in detail for readers.

This article will explain everything that a defendant should know about the California statute of limitations for a drug possession.

California statute of limitations violations will result case dismissal and the defendant walking away without punishment.

This blog goes over places where a citizen can carry a gun in public, explains new gun laws in California and why they were needed.

This article will define and describe situations where California may restrict an individual's ability to own or carry a gun.

California law does not allow anyone in the state to legally carry a hidden firearm without a valid concealed weapons permit. 

The child access prevention laws hold people accountable for negligently storing firearms leading to criminal and civil liability.

This article discusses the legality of to-go alcoholic beverages from establishments and rules to be followed when purchasing.

This article delves into the complexities of driving hungover and how an experienced DUI lawyer may offer assistance in these cases.

The Constitution does protect the right to bear arms at the Federal level, but the states can enact their own gun control levels.

This article discusses the consequences of a DUI conviction, defines the three types of pleas, and the pros/cons of a no contest plea.

California courts generally assess DUI cases, focusing on the facts and circumstances surrounding the incident like alcohol addiction.

In this article, we will define and discuss instances of public intoxication and how an individual may be able to fight this charge.

In this article, we will discuss the diminished capacity defense and its use to prove a defendant was suffering from a mental disorder.

This blog goes over the doctrine which states the seller is not liable for any difficulties the buyer has with the item after the sale.

This article will provide more information on the wild beast test, how the test is performed, and its use to prove legal insanity.

The principal goal of the best evidence rule is to avoid mistakes and inconsistencies that can occur when secondary evidence is used.

This test assesses the defendant's ability to control impulses that lead to illegal behavior by looking at certain requirements.